Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 19:28
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 691 69% 561 Pts	64-Core 880 54% 880 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 36.3 31% 34.8 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 37 Splatting 34.8 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2094 606 609 610 607 610 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 2,466 Write 2,126 Mixed 1,341 SusWrite 856 378% 1,697 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 66.7 217% 71.9 MB/s	DQ Read 425 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 308 251% 359 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 33.9 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 29.6 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	56x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16