Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VW
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 13:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 132
59% 96 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 268
28% 225 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Asus(1043 1C5D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 17.3
17% 17.9 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 21
Splatting 17
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 171 168 174 107 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 409
Write 161
Mixed 160
SusWrite 133
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 10.8
70% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 75.9
84% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 67%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
97GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 94 91 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 101
Write 83
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 93.8
56% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VW Builds (Compare 2,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP - $1,049

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback