Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VW
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '18 at 09:53
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 532
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Asus(1043 1C5D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 19.6
19% 20.1 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.8
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 164 177 177 173 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 404
Write 170
Mixed 174
SusWrite 170
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 11.3
94% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 73.9
82% 138 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 67%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
178GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67% Good
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 122
66% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VW Builds (Compare 2,478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP - $1,049

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback