Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL552VW
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160906
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '18 at 13:35
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 140 54% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 432 39% 330 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 1C5D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9835 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 5.72 8% 9.15 fps	MRender 20.7 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 16.8 12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB 12,768 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2317002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 148 150 150 157 156 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 149 Write 138 Mixed 139 SusWrite 150 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 7.8 42% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 72.4 76% 124 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 67%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 45GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 85 83 71 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 68.2 Write 73.3 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 82.1 43% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 8,819 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GL552VW Builds (Compare 2,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP - $1,049

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	2,055x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	404x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1,617x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	842x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples	321x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	219x
HFS256G39MND-2300A 256GBBench 64%, 2,675 samples	65x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	424x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	357x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	170x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Total price: $1,049

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16