Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VW
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160906
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateSep 17 '18 at 17:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 164
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 523
51% 420 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Asus(1043 1C5D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9924
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 18.2
16% 18.3 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 16.8
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 147 161 169 167 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 410
Write 168
Mixed 184
SusWrite 142
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 11.5
71% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 74.7
83% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 67%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
137GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 93 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 67
Write 70.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 91.5
44% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VW Builds (Compare 2,478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP - $1,049

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback