Dell Latitude E5550

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDell Latitude E5550  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DG7XK
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 20:25
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 130
63% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 189
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 062C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 5.81
3% 5.02 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.87
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 293 291 294 293 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 414
Mixed 343
SusWrite 305
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 43.9
142% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 291
226% 306 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 124%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
56GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 9.3 14 9.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 84.1
Write 32.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 12.4
35% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
82% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 30%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
3GB free, PID 6200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 15 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 19.9
Write 17.7
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 16.3
23% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.3
220% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 17%
HITACHI HTS542525K9SA00 250GB
13GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 21 20 19 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 29.9
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 19.6
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5550 Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback