Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4310U 14,648 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 61 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 119 49% 82.6 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 171 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 05CB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.89% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 5.9 3% 3.83 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.89% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 mSATA 128GB-$80 987 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231512 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 408 Write 220 Mixed 180 59% 269 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 22.5 83% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 124 121% 195 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 12.1 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 11.5 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	1,966x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	1x
HD Graphics FamilyIncredibleBench 3%, 12 samples	1x

SSD
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	313x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	64x
SM841N mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 851 samples	49x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	120x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	76x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	72x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16