Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 03:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 101
49% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 187
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 42 51 32 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 243
Write 185
Mixed 165
SusWrite 46.6
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 18.2
68% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 25.2
23% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
231GB free
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 62.3
Write 64.2
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 80
42% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
744GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 190
Write 174
Mixed 97
SusWrite 80.1
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 109%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
39GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 41 50 31 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 42.7
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 45.6
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF QDEC3U004G1658HEC 9905474-012.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 7.3
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback