Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 00:39
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 103
47% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 205
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 34
20% 27.5 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 25.1
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 45 43 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 117
Write 108
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 43.1
20% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 9.8
39% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 12.5
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 13.3
10% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
231GB free
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 80 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 63
Write 63.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 79.3
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
744GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 80 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 181
Write 159
Mixed 74
SusWrite 79.4
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 109%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
50GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 43 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 30
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 44.2
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF QDEC3U004G1658HEC 9905474-012.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback