Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '19 at 23:21
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 39% FM1 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 68.7 39% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 104 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 89.1 6% 89.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 4.17 Reflection 4.88 Parallax 3.59 3% 4.22 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 3.04 3% 4.19 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 62 70 70 69 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.7% Below average	Read 192 Write 153 Mixed 159 SusWrite 67.3 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 18.6 69% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 51 DQ Mixed 24.2 22% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 245GB free Firmware: AX002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 70 70 69 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 77.5 Write 75.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 69.8 46% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 818GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 185 Write 31.3 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 0.1 49% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 109%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50 4,831 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 64GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 76.7 Write 46.8 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 0.1 32% 42.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF QDEC3U004G1658HEC 9905474-012.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 10GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.6% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	10x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
SP900 256GBAdata $300Bench 74%, 9,430 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	1x
99P5471-004.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 601 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359