Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 04:20
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 93.3
46% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 179
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 30.6
20% 26.3 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 30
Splatting 25
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.1 8.4 10 9.2 9.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.5% Poor
Read 155
Write 118
Mixed 130
SusWrite 9.3
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 13
54% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 22.4
19% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
231GB free
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 69 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 59.7
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 72.8
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
732GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 69 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 171
Write 152
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 72.9
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 109%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
54GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 13 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 65.1
Write 11.5
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 11.6
23% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF QDEC3U004G1658HEC 9905474-012.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback