Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 22:52
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 662
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.1% Good
Lighting 58
Reflection 147
Parallax 136
47% 114 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 938 1305 1226 1104 1017 792 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,811
Write 1,444
Mixed 685
SusWrite 1,064
279% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 62.5
223% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 455
374% 546 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 233%
Great: 283%
Samsung PM851 M.2 2280 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: EXT25D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 33 34 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 365
Write 32.8
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 32.4
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.9
46% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 74%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
361GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 906 907 907 906 906 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,358
Write 934
Mixed 823
SusWrite 899
224% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 77.1
266% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 222
238% 386 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 213%
Great: 209%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 126 130 128 137 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 124
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 131
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 88%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
1.5TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 176 191 175 197 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 186
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.2
150% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 120%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
723GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 102 100 105 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 153
Write 147
Mixed 101
SusWrite 101
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
919GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 103 106 103 111 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 160
Write 156
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 106
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 100%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
3TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 134 136 132 137 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 123
Write 130
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 135
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.1
130% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 120%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
447GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 91 93 92 98 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 87.2
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 93.8
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 174 187 183 200 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 185
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72
698GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 85 87 85 90 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 82.9
Mixed 62
SusWrite 87.2
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
301GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63% Good
Read 123
Write 90.1
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 96.5
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63%
Great: 71%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
310GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 64 36 26 45 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 125
Write 104
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 62.7
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: A4GNW91X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 153 153 156 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 194
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 156
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.8
223% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 55.5
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 24.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 130%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback