Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 16:07
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 207
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 643
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 146
Parallax 135
108% 138 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 133
Splatting 85.3
89% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 81 91 82 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 1,615
Write 83.2
Mixed 144
SusWrite 85
102% 482 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.9
74% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 283%
Samsung PM851 M.2 2280 128GB
113GB free
Firmware: EXT25D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 25 25 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 342
Write 30
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 24.2
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.7
46% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 74%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
93GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 116 36 62 51 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 1,192
Write 186
Mixed 312
SusWrite 80.5
95% 443 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 13.6
99% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 209%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 122 137 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 126
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 128
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
1.5TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 96 109 97 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 77
SusWrite 108
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 120%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
719GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 96 107 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 154
Write 147
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 99.7
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
925GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 84 95 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 155
Write 147
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 91.6
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 100%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
2.5TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 131 140 125 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 119
Write 130
Mixed 69
SusWrite 133
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 120%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
471GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 84 92 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 84
SusWrite 86.8
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 96 107 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 139
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 107
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72
605GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 78 85 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 90
Write 85
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 80.7
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
301GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 31 68 88 80 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 113
Write 51
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 59.6
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 71%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
310GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 111 116 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 125
Write 112
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 114
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: A4GNW91X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 159 141 159 143 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 191
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 149
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
186% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 43.2
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 21.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 112%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback