Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 22:49
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 470
49% 393 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.5
4% 4.25 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 88 89 86 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 215
Write 207
Mixed 199
SusWrite 86.2
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 30.5
98% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 80.2
DQ Mixed 44.7
38% 53 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
167GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 82 80 82 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.7% Average
Read 219
Write 203
Mixed 195
SusWrite 80.8
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 18.4
81% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 21.9
27% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
192GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 82 80 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 76
Write 73.3
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 80.7
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 74%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
229GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 88 89 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44% Average
Read 65.8
Write 37.6
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 86.9
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $527
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback