Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-2600-$306
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.7% Good
SC Int 94.9
SC Float 96.1
SC Mixed 94.9
76% 95.3 Pts
QC Int 312
QC Float 310
QC Mixed 316
71% 313 Pts
MC Int 429
MC Float 449
MC Mixed 429
65% 436 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Asus(1043 839B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 11.2
4% 12.3 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 7.1
5% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$73
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 83 87 88 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.4% Average
Read 209
Write 207
Mixed 198
SusWrite 84.1
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 30.8
96% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.3
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 44.9
38% 53 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
167GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 81 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24% Poor
Read 219
Write 197
Mixed 190
SusWrite 80.6
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 9.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
192GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 81 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 79.7
Write 73.8
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 80.5
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 74%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
229GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 85 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 67.3
Write 70
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 87.3
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $660
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback