Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-E/M.2  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 13:51
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 615
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
XFX(1682 3130) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 25.3
22% 24.9 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 24
Splatting 28.1
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 47 2.1 37 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 302
Write 103
Mixed 105
SusWrite 75.7
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 19.9
83% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 74.7
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 119
85% 106 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
236GB free
Firmware: AM001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 95.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 93.2
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
619GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 181 178 183 183 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 178
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 181
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
200GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 130
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 74%
Great: 69%
Generic USB MS Reader 2GB
1GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Read 5.3
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 4.7
5% 4.05 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 18.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback