Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 113 2-Core 220 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 410 56% 415 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 555 604 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Apple(106B 016B) 2GB CLim: 855 MHz, MLim: 1280 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.6 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 22.5 Parallax 21.6 15% 20.9 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 24.3 17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0512L 500GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXS8 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,617 Write 1,316 Mixed 963 288% 1,299 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 35.6 116% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 840 DQ Write 511 DQ Mixed 643 488% 665 MB/s
Poor: 146% Great: 241%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x3841544631473634485A2D324733453220202020 2x8GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82% Excellent	MC Read 30 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 24.7 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 26.5 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

RAM
0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334232202020 2x4GBUnknownBench 69%, 515 samples	66x
0x484D413835315336414652364E2D554820202020 2x4GBUnknownBench 69%, 309 samples	35x
0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334532202020 2x4GBUnknownBench 70%, 241 samples	26x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $95

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16