Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 22:41
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 913
84% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 169
Parallax 169
147% 173 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 149
Splatting 109
116% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$80
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 1070 1078 1076 983 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,179
Write 1,049
Mixed 1,019
SusWrite 881
284% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 88.3
300% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 607
540% 806 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 274%
Great: 241%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 277 277 275 276 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 473
Mixed 406
SusWrite 269
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 58
206% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 229
207% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
31GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 483 486 434 117 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 452
Mixed 412
SusWrite 332
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 67.7
229% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
419GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2285 623 625 623 623 624 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,468
Write 2,221
Mixed 1,586
SusWrite 900
401% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 89.2
301% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,434
DQ Write 1,153
DQ Mixed 1,238
942% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 305%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4000 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 31
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 46.3
SC Mixed 34.7
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 47.3
84% 47.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback