Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 810
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 170
Parallax 168
147% 173 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 149
Splatting 109
116% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$80
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1069 1077 1074 841 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2156
Write 1,043
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 878
282% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 88
298% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 633
552% 813 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 273%
Great: 241%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 277 276 274 258 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 458
Mixed 424
SusWrite 262
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 58.5
206% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 233
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
31GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 481 477 182 82 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 458
Mixed 412
SusWrite 294
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 67.3
228% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
419GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2112 720 621 623 622 621 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,301
Write 2,102
Mixed 1,549
SusWrite 886
382% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 88.5
276% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 1,231
933% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 289%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4000 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback