Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 214
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 415
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 74.6
0% 47.1 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 55
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 71 72 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 419
Write 372
Mixed 309
SusWrite 105
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 31.6
130% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 184
169% 257 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 93%
oyunkey 240GB
72GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 74 63 70 62 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 515
Write 419
Mixed 406
SusWrite 125
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 1.2
114% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 3.3
22% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 89%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
51GB free
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 166 169 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 779
Mixed 756
SusWrite 188
196% 893 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 75.2
261% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 729
574% 797 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 203%
Great: 234%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
25GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 83.7
Write 39
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 73.6
50% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 74%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
8GB free, PID dd3b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.5 0 1.2 13 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 38
Write 4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.4
13% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.7
112% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 30%
WDC WD50 00AADS-56S9B1 500GB
9GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 35
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 40.6
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback