Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 10:37
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$340
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 58
1-Core 119
2-Core 215
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 557
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 785
53% 785 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
Nvidia(10DE 1F07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 214
Reflection 284
Parallax 353
56% 283 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 258
Splatting 122
70% 183 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 118%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 212 196 154 169 146 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 145
Write 107
Mixed 125
SusWrite 169
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 13.7
52% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 142
104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
97GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 507 507 438 471 417 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 756
Mixed 414
SusWrite 456
114% 503 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 25.4
82% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 661
472% 606 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 320%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
22GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 66 57 41 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 176
Write 131
Mixed 134
SusWrite 81.8
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 16.5
52% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 99.4
86% 130 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 107%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$150
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 139 146 143 145 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 111
Write 100
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 139
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MPAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 105 103 104 108 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 95.3
Mixed 58
SusWrite 103
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 12,705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 138%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $1,396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback