Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '19 at 11:45
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 93 1-Core 106 2-Core 215 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 423 56% 422 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.1% Average	Lighting 57.2 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 81.2 47% 68.6 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 56.6 Splatting 54.8 48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 167 168 168 168 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,904 Write 727 Mixed 586 SusWrite 187 186% 851 MB/s	4K Read 62.9 4K Write 179 4K Mixed 83.1 296% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 886 DQ Write 723 DQ Mixed 703 554% 771 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 234%
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB 14,793 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 57GB free Firmware: SBFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 72 72 73 72 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 476 Write 270 Mixed 319 SusWrite 107 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 33.9 143% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 185 168% 253 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 93%
oyunkey 240GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 73GB free Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 63 60 69 47 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 514 Write 442 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 113 60% 274 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 0.9 52% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 5.5 DQ Mixed 31 31% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 89%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 1,890 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 39GB free Firmware: 1405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 77.3 Write 81.4 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 76 55% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 74%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 11GB free, PID dd3b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 21 23 24 23 25 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 96.5 Write 54.4 Mixed 48 SusWrite 23.5 67% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.5 145% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 30%
Intenso External USB HDD 1TB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 128GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 39.4 Write 41.5 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 41 49% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 28%
WDC WD50 00AADS-56S9B1 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 9GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 39.3 Write 36.8 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 40.7 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	MC Read 33 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 30.1 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 38.1 SC Mixed 25.6 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	196x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	133x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	132x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	81x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	48x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16