Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 01:04
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 97
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 433
59% 439 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
MSI(1462 2730) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 80GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 34 27 22 18 13 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 137
Write 92.9
Mixed 106
SusWrite 28.8
20% 91 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 12.2
51% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 79.9
62% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 50%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$55
74GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 122 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 122
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
135GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 61 62 59 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 54.6
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 59
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33%
Great: 43%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
353GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 34
Write 26.9
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 35.1
43% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GR1333D364L9/2G 075D GR1333D364L9/4G 8GB
1800, 1800, 1800 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback