Packard imedia S1300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPackard imedia S1300  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S1300
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II 170u
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 26
2-Core 28.6
33% 42 Pts
4-Core 28.9
8-Core 28.8
4% 28.8 Pts
64-Core 28.8
2% 28.8 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Acer(1025 0394) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 13 9.3 22 28 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 98.8
Write 93
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 24
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 70%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
430GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 7.9 15 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 17
Write 17.8
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 15.2
22% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 6.6
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S1300 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback