Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 03:32
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 219
84% 144 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 444
60% 444 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
MSI(1462 2730) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 80GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 42 27 27 22 19 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 243
Write 88.3
Mixed 112
SusWrite 33.4
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 8.5
44% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 66.7
DQ Mixed 76.5
61% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 50%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
109GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 116 118 120 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 65
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 62 61 62 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 62.8
Mixed 41
SusWrite 63.1
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 43%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
292GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 17.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 24.6
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GR1333D364L9/2G 075D GR1333D364L9/4G 8GB
1800, 1800, 1800 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback