Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 17:42
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 425
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
MSI(1462 2730) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.1.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 80GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 49 33 34 22 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 293
Write 91.2
Mixed 100
SusWrite 37.9
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 3.7
38% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 93.1
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 75.2
58% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 50%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$55
111GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 123 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 125
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 124
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
137GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 42 46 46 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 73.2
Mixed 47
SusWrite 44.4
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
216GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 21.5
Mixed 25
SusWrite 26.2
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GR1333D364L9/2G 075D GR1333D364L9/4G 8GB
1800, 1800, 1800 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 14.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback