ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X58M (MS-7593)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	MSI MS-7593
Motherboard	MSI X58M (MS-7593) (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110905
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '14 at 23:39
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 960-$220 16,233 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 99 2-Core 195 67% 147 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 588 57% 470 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 92GB free Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 50 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 18 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 68 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 633310409
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2TB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 131245817 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2337 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 208321299 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6371 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1887 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 31 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 74 54 437452826 (C2) HDA temperature 26 46 68719476762 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 51 31 131245817 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 16428249918511 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3316880997 (F2) Unknown 100 253 179087664	50% Above average	Read 86.9 Write 87.3 Mixed 86.5 66% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.47 109% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 61%
WD WD3000JD-00KLB0 300GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 279GB free Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 240 (03) Spinup time 253 181 883 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7008 (05) Reallocated sector count 197 197 22 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25872 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4959 (C2) HDA temperature 118 95 32 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.7% Below average	Read 61.8 Write 61.8 Mixed 57.9 46% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.42 117% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 34%
Seagate ST3500630A 500GB-$87 622 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 32GB free Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 30.9 Mixed 30.3 23% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.42 101% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 42%
Maxtor 5T020H2 20GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 19GB free Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 10.5 Mixed 15.5 13% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.46 4K Mixed 0.25 58% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 21%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 11GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 178 816 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7847 (05) Reallocated sector count 197 197 22 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23215 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5003 (BE) vendor-specific 64 37 36 (C2) HDA temperature 114 87 36 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	20.8% Poor	Read 35.4 Write 36.6 Mixed 36.6 27% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.47 117% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical X58M (MS-7593) Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI X58M (MS-7593)

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	33x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	24x
Core i7 930Intel $149Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	11x

SSD
AGM S128G 128GBAbkoBench 79%, 3 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	7x

RAM
48GBUnknownBench 49%, 2,786 samples	38x
60GBUnknownBench 55%, 662 samples	27x
52GBUnknownBench 37%, 680 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $300

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback