Asus C51/MCP51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus C51/MCP51  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NODUSM
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 08:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 71
38% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 70.7
8-Core 71.4
10% 71.1 Pts
64-Core 71.3
4% 71.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-XT
Sapphire(174B 2E42) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 1.34
2% 3.35 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 42 45 51 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 60
Write 58.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 43.4
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 59%
Maxtor 5T020H2 20GB
19GB free
Firmware: TAH71DP0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 36.4
Write 37
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 36.2
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C51/MCP51 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus C51/MCP51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback