Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1122
102% 857 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 107
Parallax 101
93% 107 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 81.6
81% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 104 40 47 93 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 368
Write 122
Mixed 303
SusWrite 107
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 36.3
142% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 113
113% 174 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 170 174 172 176 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 120
Write 131
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 168
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
365GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 82 82 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 98
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 81.8
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
718GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 82 82 84 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 87
Write 87
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 81.8
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 51%
WD Ext HDD 1021 2.5TB
2TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 33.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 36.6
45% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.2% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $739
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback