Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '19 at 14:53
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 82.7 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 822 80% 656 Pts	64-Core 1,014 63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2088 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 118 Parallax 109 87% 111 fps	MRender 99 Gravity 100 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,176 Write 1,519 Mixed 733 324% 1,476 MB/s	4K Read 54.3 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 56.4 236% 87.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,012 DQ Write 934 DQ Mixed 655 579% 867 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 72GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 397 Write 278 Mixed 308 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 49.5 174% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 290 212% 275 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
Toshiba THNS512GG8BBAA 512GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 64GB free Firmware: AGYA0201 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 221 Write 138 Mixed 128 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 16.1 66% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 11.6 DQ Write 45.4 DQ Mixed 19 17% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 44%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 334GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 163 Write 104 Mixed 83 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 11 50% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 13.8 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 162GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 85.3 Write 29.2 Mixed 29.7 36% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 29.3 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 25 SC Write 36.3 SC Mixed 28.3 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16