Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 19:58
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 816
80% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2089 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 121
Parallax 101
91% 111 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 102
Splatting 106
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 634 324 319 298 285 276 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,164
Write 1,506
Mixed 563
SusWrite 356
253% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 62
230% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 647
574% 863 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 222%
Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
72GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 193 192 194 196 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 383
Write 274
Mixed 265
SusWrite 196
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 46.4
168% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 284
208% 272 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 94%
Toshiba THNS512GG8BBAA 512GB
64GB free
Firmware: AGYA0201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 172 177 180 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 193
Write 138
Mixed 130
SusWrite 177
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 17.8
80% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 46.1
DQ Mixed 18.6
17% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
335GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 432 73 195 191 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 180
Write 104
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 230
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 10.9
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
191GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 85.8
Write 28.5
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 24.2
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 27.7
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 27.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback