Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 14:42
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 774
78% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.2% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 113
Parallax 104
82% 106 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 99.3
79% 96.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 642 324 324 318 265 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 1,506
Mixed 570
SusWrite 352
253% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 62.4
231% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 650
574% 861 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 222%
Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
72GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 195 202 199 180 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 274
Mixed 315
SusWrite 198
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 49.5
175% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 290
209% 270 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
Toshiba THNS512GG8BBAA 512GB
64GB free
Firmware: AGYA0201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 174 169 181 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 176
Write 143
Mixed 129
SusWrite 174
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 18.2
78% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 43.6
DQ Mixed 19
17% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 44%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
334GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 394 68 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 445
Write 365
Mixed 338
SusWrite 200
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 34.9
141% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 184
174% 269 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
162GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 26 26 26 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 76.3
Write 28.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 26.2
30% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 28.7
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback