Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 13:34
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 119
2-Core 193
79% 134 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 623
62% 504 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 61.1
56% 66.2 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 54.4
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900NS38 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 162 169 163 166 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 296
Write 244
Mixed 234
SusWrite 161
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 31.6
136% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 164
137% 196 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 170 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 136
Mixed 81
SusWrite 168
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 114%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
715GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 186 187 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 226
Write 191
Mixed 125
SusWrite 186
134% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.5
303% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 119%
Great: 117%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB
771GB free, PID 0286
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 38
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 19.6
43% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 70%
BUFFALO External HDD 4TB
2TB free, PID 027e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 34.8
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 18.7
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 59%
BUFFALO External HDD 1.5TB
327GB free, PID 01a9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 35 32 36 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 31.2
Mixed 18
SusWrite 33.5
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X8G64CB8HB9N-DG 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 19
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback