HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 14:11
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 155
54% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 320
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 12.1
11% 12.3 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 11.8
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.74.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 107 33 126 33 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 306
Write 97.8
Mixed 213
SusWrite 82.5
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 9.5
41% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 93.3
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 17.9
22% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32%
Great: 98%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
264GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 316 257 100 100 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 378
Write 189
Mixed 315
SusWrite 200
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 28.6
104% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 233
198% 287 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
184GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 93
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 94.9
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Portable 750GB
451GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 39.3
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 40.4
50% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X8G64CB8HB9N-DG 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback