HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160404
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 00:33
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 167 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 328 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 550 8,236 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB CLim: 1409 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 24.3 16% 25.2 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 18.8 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 476 Write 132 Mixed 124 53% 244 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 18.2 85% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 50.1 84% 168 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 41GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 93 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 98 Write 96.7 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 93.4 62% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,675x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	553x
Core i7-2600Intel $165Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	548x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	277x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	239x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	125x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	55x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16