Fujitsu CELSIUS W410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W410  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '20 at 12:47
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 163
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 312
39% 297 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 71 72 72 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 125
Write 89.2
Mixed 109
SusWrite 71
22% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 20
88% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 86.5
65% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 73%
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
165GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 236 245 246 246 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.4% Very good
Read 188
Write 213
Mixed 192
SusWrite 231
47% 206 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 41.7
126% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 198
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W410 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback