HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160404
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 00:20
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 169
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 318
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1344 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 12% Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 125 124 114 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 465
Write 134
Mixed 126
SusWrite 117
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 18.5
86% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 47.8
80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
41GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 100 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 50.8
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 99.5
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback