Asrock B150M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B150M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 12:56
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 572
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
PwrHis(1787 200F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 51.3
Parallax 55
0% 35.4 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 36.8
34% 43 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 189 190 179 187 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 458
Write 428
Mixed 260
SusWrite 195
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 37.6
134% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 248
204% 293 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
931GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 453 407 441 450 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 450
Mixed 426
SusWrite 438
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 44.1
145% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
31GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 32 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 12.2
Write 30.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 30.3
18% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 69%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 63
Write 65.7
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 80.7
86% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 52%
ADATA HD710 PRO 5TB
3TB free, PID a75a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 118 122 116 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 120
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 118
140% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 1TB
219GB free, PID 0240
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 106 108 108 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47% Average
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 107
134% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB-$30
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 19.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M Pro4 Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock B150M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback