Fujitsu ESPRIMO P720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3221-A1
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 00:36
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 441
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.5
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 19 181 84 93 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 352
Write 287
Mixed 260
SusWrite 105
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 6.8
40% 9.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32%
Great: 55%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
141GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 107 105 104 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 470
Write 422
Mixed 368
SusWrite 151
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 33.2
143% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 223
195% 289 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
138GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 81 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 90.4
Write 90.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 82
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST500NM0011 500GB-$78
253GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 108 104 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 108
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P720 Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback