Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 158 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 200 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3059) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1 0% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 73 70 72 81 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 87.8 Write 88.5 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 74.4 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 12.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.9 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	6x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $97Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 68 samples	5x
CT51264BD160B.C16F 4x4GBCrucialBench 50%, 640 samples	1x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 40%, 3 samples	1x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $167