Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M LE (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '18 at 18:21
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 337 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 83FB) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.02 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 1.87 2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 107 131 57 165 75 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58% Above average	Read 259 Write 248 Mixed 222 SusWrite 119 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 30.6 101% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 119 112% 173 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 747GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 131 132 134 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 136 Write 136 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 132 75% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 362GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 87 86 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 73.3 Write 74.4 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 86 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 495GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 138 139 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 118 Write 119 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 138 72% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 436GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 27.1 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 28.2 37% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GB 6,486 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	124x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	50x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	67x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	18x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16