Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive6.43% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M LE  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 19:21
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Memory 34.2
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 81.4
28% 50 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 151
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 83FB) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 2
2% 2.06 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 2.07
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 4.5 5.7 5.4 5.5 6.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.43% Terrible
Read 89.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 7.9
14% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.2
8% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
806GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 4.4 5.5 5.6 5.6 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 91.5
Write 84.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 8.2
34% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
362GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.4 5.5 5.3 5.4 6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Read 6.6
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.2
4% 5.55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
495GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 4.6 5.8 5.3 6.2 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28% Poor
Read 89.3
Write 85.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 8
34% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 28%
Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.1 2.3 2.7 2.1 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 2.2
SusWrite 2.2
4% 2.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
630GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.3 5.2 4.8 4.9 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Read 4.6
Write 11.1
Mixed 5
SusWrite 4.9
9% 6.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback