Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M LE (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '18 at 08:48
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 170 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 331 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 83FB) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.53 1% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 130 93 20 158 116 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.4% Above average	Read 257 Write 248 Mixed 232 SusWrite 117 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 29.9 100% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 118 111% 173 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 751GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 133 132 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 136 Write 138 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 132 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 362GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 86 86 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 72.6 Write 70.7 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 86.2 49% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 495GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 138 138 139 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 115 Write 120 Mixed 13.4 SusWrite 138 69% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 518GB free, PID ab31 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 28.4 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 19.3 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 456GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 33.4 Write 27.2 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 19.4 33% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GB 6,486 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	124x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	50x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	67x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	18x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16