Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 09:57
Run Duration505 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 896
85% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,308
81% 1,308 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 59.9
49% 61.1 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 54.2
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2157 672 603 604 604 606 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2,220
Mixed 1,456
SusWrite 874
394% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 68.5
224% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 345
254% 335 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 239%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
174GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 724 577 579 580 577 577 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Avago MR9361-8i 12TB
707GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 204 504 217 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.5% Average
Read 29
Write 4.8
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 178
14% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 36.6
65% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 8.5
48% 116 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 42%
Avago MR9361-8i 24TB
219GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.5 8.3 8 8.1 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 71
Write 10.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 7.9
6% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 36.8
56% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 43.6
DQ Mixed 10.4
49% 118 MB/s
Avago MR9361-8i 32TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 30 34 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 10
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 40.4
9% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 33.4
61% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 10.7
34% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 61%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
29GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 303 214 121 110 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 447
Write 407
Mixed 326
SusWrite 210
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 33.1
112% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 179
162% 245 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 35
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 31.3
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $832
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback