HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ENVY 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 228D
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 14 '16 at 19:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 147
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 198
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 228D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 4.31
3% 6.64 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 5.61
4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 494
Write 392
Mixed 406
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 20.2
110% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 37.4
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 92
76% 105 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
383GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 103
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.25
96% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback