Lenovo 20DKS06V00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20DKS06V00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20DKS06V00
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 21:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 143
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 240
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 503E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.73
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 6.28
4% 6.02 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 4.67
Splatting 10.1
6% 7.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 290 297 297 298 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 300
Mixed 238
SusWrite 294
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 37.4
138% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 248
210% 309 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 101%
ST910082 8AS 100GB
89GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.9
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 39.6
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback