Asus P5KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KC  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '18 at 22:19
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 46.5
27% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 88.9
12% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 93.1
6% 93.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Asus(1043 02A8) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 1.44
1% 1.19 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 113 110 120 118 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 155
Write 152
Mixed 162
SusWrite 108
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 26.9
93% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 36.6
32% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
1TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 95 101 101 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 84
Write 92
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 95.2
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$39
679GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 90 96 96 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 90.8
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 89.8
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
197GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 111 113 121 120 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 110
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 111
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
200GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 52 53 55 54 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 66.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 52.6
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 61%
ST910082 8AS 100GB
87GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 29 31 30 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 34.5
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 28.3
34% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback