Asus P5KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KC  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '18 at 22:49
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 55.2
34% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 94.6
8-Core 93.7
13% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 97.8
6% 97.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Asus(1043 02A8) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.47
1% 1.36 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 125 124 125 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.6% Average
Read 191
Write 156
Mixed 166
SusWrite 119
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 29.4
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 36.8
33% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 92.3
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 99
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 70%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
679GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 98 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 64
Mixed 61
SusWrite 95.1
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$70
197GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 107 122 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 192
Write 158
Mixed 81
SusWrite 119
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
200GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 49 56 57 55 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 69
Write 64.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 55.4
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 61%
ST910082 8AS 100GB
87GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 30.3
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback