Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 09:33
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 251
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 810
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37B1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 167
Parallax 180
143% 174 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 148
Splatting 107
116% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 621 325 321 327 326 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,047
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,120
SusWrite 373
278% 1,252 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 65.1
207% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 701
516% 686 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 200%
Great: 280%
Intenso Sata III 127GB
117GB free
Firmware: N1126F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 262 265 267 263 264 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 474
Write 268
Mixed 273
SusWrite 264
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 36.3
125% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 180
154% 228 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
136GB free
Firmware: SD03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 61 63 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 52.5
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 61.5
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34%
Great: 38%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
596GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 103 104 100 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 107
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 102
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%
Fujitsu MHV2120BH PL 120GB
7GB free
Firmware: 892C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 31.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 37.2
23% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
298GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 85 84 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 83.5
Write 47.8
Mixed 56
SusWrite 82.3
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 203 205 203 205 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 192
Mixed 81
SusWrite 202
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 203 206 205 207 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 201
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 205
125% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 160 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 134
Mixed 106
SusWrite 160
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$84
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 37.2
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 18.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback