Medion Akoya E4020 E MD8306/2475

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemMedion Akoya E4020 E MD8306/2475  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D3F3-EM2
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160321
Uptime16.3 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 120
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 193
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 9BCD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 12.6
7% 9.93 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 8
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 127GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 216 250 181 152 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 365
Write 255
Mixed 246
SusWrite 186
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 18.9
68% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 82.6
66% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 14.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback